LICENSE file

[mrdwab]

Never used Apache licence. Do we need to add the following to the top of each .R file? What should be in the place of the "name of copyright owner"?

   Copyright {yyyy} {name of copyright owner}

   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
   You may obtain a copy of the License at

       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
   limitations under the License.

[romunov]

I think the license file should cover the license. If there is an
exception, thenlicense should be in the file that is being licensed under a
different license and thenlicense file shouldnindicate that this license is
not covering all files and user should check before using this package or
distributing it.
On Mar 31, 2016 4:58 AM, "Ananda Mahto" [email protected] wrote:

Never used Apache licence. Do we need to add the following to the top of
each .R file? What should be in the place of the "name of copyright
owner"?

Copyright {yyyy} {name of copyright owner}

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5