-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assertion error for reads without sequence #103
Comments
I have the same problem :-/ |
Does this work on your data? https://github.com/quinlan-lab/STRling/tree/zero-len |
Yes |
@brentp mentioned memory concerns. Any chance you could check the memory usage with the two different versions (your PR, vs. the fix above)? |
I am a bit busy at the moment and to be honest I dont see the point in this test. There are only a couple of read pairs for this within a few millions. I dont think I could detect any memory leak. But even if, there are 2 possible outcomes: either I detect something, then you have to look at the code. Or I can't detect anything, in that you should still check the code for something fishy! |
I get the following assertion error:
This is probably due to the * in the sequence and quality field. By specification these are allowed, for example when the sequence is fully trimmed by the adapter trimming step. Even if the read itself is useless (also because it is unmapped), it is still useful to have them in the alignment file to remain a complete paired end file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: