Meshing of particle size distributions #5133
Description
Description
I was wandering if it would be a good idea to have a fized step size instead of a fixed number of mesh points when discretizing a multi particle model or a DFN model with particle size distribution.
Especially for wide distributions it would save a lot of compute time since the smaller particles will need less mesh points.
In my codes I am implementing this by creating a different domain for each particle size ( f"positive particle {i}"), all of them within the same secondary domains.
However, this would prevent use of Integral when averaging over the PSD and it might have other disadvantages I am not aware of.
Motivation
No response
Possible Implementation
No response
Additional context
No response