Add pyperf to python PyPI organisation?

[hugovk]

Following https://discuss.python.org/t/request-python-organisation-on-pypi/26545, we now have two organisations on PyPI: https://pypi.org/org/cpython/ and https://pypi.org/org/python/

We can add the pyperf PyPI project to one of the organisations.

The main benefits are:

• Visibility: we'll be able to see our packages under a PyPI org page

• Maintainability: we can share granular PyPI access to improve the bus factor

Would you like to add this package to one of the orgs?

We should follow the SC's categorisation when deciding which one to use:

• cpython: for development tools that are tied fairly closely to CPython development. This could for example include blurb and cherry-picker. Users generally shouldn’t have to care except for developing CPython itself (although that doesn’t mean the tools necessarily have to be unusable for anyone else).
• python: for general-audience projects that are maintained the Python Core Devs. An example for this category would be tzdata.

pyperformance was added to the python org via python/pyperformance#370, and @diegorusso suggested there that pyperf would fit in python.

I know this repo is under https://github.com/psf/ and not https://github.com/python/ on GitHub, but I don't think that matters here?

[vstinner]

It sounds like a good idea. python is the right organization.

[corona10]

I am fine with it

[hugovk]

@vstinner @corona10 Please could one of you add me as "owner" to https://pypi.org/project/pyperf? I'll then move it to https://pypi.org/org/python/.

Thanks!

[vstinner]

@vstinner @corona10 Please could one of you add me as "owner" to https://pypi.org/project/pyperf? I'll then move it to https://pypi.org/org/python/.

Sure. I sent you an invite.

[hugovk]

Thanks, https://pypi.org/project/pyperf/ is now in https://pypi.org/org/python/ 🚀