You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current approach of treating all skipped char indices as ligatures with evenly-spaced interior caret positions is not appropriate for many graphemes, e.g. surrogate pair emojis and characters with marks. The proper approach appears to be:
By default, just use a single caret position for all char indices within a glyph
See discussion in #304 and #306
The current approach of treating all skipped char indices as ligatures with evenly-spaced interior caret positions is not appropriate for many graphemes, e.g. surrogate pair emojis and characters with marks. The proper approach appears to be:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: