Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.62500% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.86%. Comparing base (ececc9c) to head (26b4122).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2906      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.89%   91.86%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         170      170              
  Lines       30291    30323      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits        27836    27857      +21     
- Misses       1827     1836       +9     
- Partials      628      630       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rchincha well, there are workaround, negate every character of the word: .*([^x][^8][^6][^_][^6][^4]|[^a][^a][^r][^c][^h][^6][^4])$

But that very soon will remind me famous perl test-test-test... :)

What happens if both "regex" and "excludeRegex" are specified? and they step on each other?

@rchincha regex first select tags, then excludeRegrex filter-out matching tags from that list.

Isn't it the same result if you have the following ops on sets of tags:

• All ∩ Regex - ExcludeRegex
• All ∩ (Regex - ExcludeRegex)
• (All - ExcludeRegex) ∩ Regex
  ?

@andaaron yes, all of that cases gives the same result. But the code more like that:

• (All ∩ Regex) - ((All ∩ Regex) ∩ ExcludeRegex) (as we do not match all tags for exclude, but the ones already matched by include regex)