Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BLS12-381 final exponentiation #183

Open
jonathanpwang opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

BLS12-381 final exponentiation #183

jonathanpwang opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jonathanpwang
Copy link
Contributor

I just want to check if the bls12381 final_exponentiate is supposed to be just ** ((p^12 - 1)/r). I had tried a comparison with just naive exponentiation (which I hope I did correctly) and it did not match. If it is intended to match, then I will try to find a reproducible example.

@kilic
Copy link
Collaborator

kilic commented Dec 21, 2024

@jonathanpwang the final exp in the implementation follows https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/875.pdf and exponent should be ** ((p^12 - 1)/r) * s where s = 3. I prepared a test below for crosschecking.

    #[test]
    fn test_finalexp_bls12() {
        // python
        // r = 0x73eda753299d7d483339d80809a1d80553bda402fffe5bfeffffffff00000001
        // q = 0x1a0111ea397fe69a4b1ba7b6434bacd764774b84f38512bf6730d2a0f6b0f6241eabfffeb153ffffb9feffffffffaaab
        // d = (q**12 - 1) // r
        // s = 3
        // print(hex(s*d))
        let e = BigUint::from_str_radix("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", 16);
        let e = e.unwrap();

        let g1 = G1Affine::generator();
        let g2 = G2Affine::generator();
        let ml = Bls12381::multi_miller_loop(&[(&g1, &g2)]);

        let r0 = ml.final_exponentiation();
        let r1 = ml.pow(&e.to_u64_digits());
        assert_eq!(r0.0, r1);
    }

Also see:
https://github.com/Consensys/gnark-crypto/blob/97d69dcde082a20847e16ba29bce35e9bfde0261/ecc/bls12-381/pairing.go#L52

@jonathanpwang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kilic ah thank you!

Apologies if I missed it, but could we add a comment above the final exp function noting this -- I had tried to find an indication of this but couldn't.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants