You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The issue precice/tutorials#374 basically originates from a bad integration of volume coupling into the overall code and a lack of testing. I decided to comment out the corresponding code to keep the existing surface coupling features working.
Todos
We need some tests that ensure that volume coupling and surface coupling with nearest projection mapping don't conflict
BenjaminRodenberg
changed the title
Volume coupling does not integrate well and is untested
Volume coupling and nearest projection mapping do not integrate well and are untested
Sep 28, 2023
The issue precice/tutorials#374 basically originates from a bad integration of volume coupling into the overall code and a lack of testing. I decided to comment out the corresponding code to keep the existing surface coupling features working.
Todos
channel-transport-reaction
as a pure FEniCS case to our testsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: