You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Attempting to create a subcircuit from a circuit which has more than one shared labeled node always results in the shared label node groupings to get truncated to a single pin on the subcircuit.
When attempting to create a subcircuit from the circuit above;
the GND_FIRST and GND_NEXT labeled nodes get truncated into a single GND_FIRST node
the 3.3V_FIRST and 3.3V_NEXT labeled nodes get truncated into a single 3.3V_NEXT node
the OUT and DIV_NEXT labeled nodes get truncated into a single DIV_NEXT node
The subcircuit creation script appears to automatically identify & truncate any shared labeled node groupings to a single node, which is not the intuitive or expected behaviour here. In my specific case the shared labeled nodes all serve unique purposes despite being shared, and I am unable to create a subcircuit because of this feature. At least this feature should be a toggleable option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Attempting to create a subcircuit from a circuit which has more than one shared labeled node always results in the shared label node groupings to get truncated to a single pin on the subcircuit.
Specific example:
TEST_1.txt
When attempting to create a subcircuit from the circuit above;
GND_FIRST
andGND_NEXT
labeled nodes get truncated into a singleGND_FIRST
node3.3V_FIRST
and3.3V_NEXT
labeled nodes get truncated into a single3.3V_NEXT
nodeOUT
andDIV_NEXT
labeled nodes get truncated into a singleDIV_NEXT
nodeThe subcircuit creation script appears to automatically identify & truncate any shared labeled node groupings to a single node, which is not the intuitive or expected behaviour here. In my specific case the shared labeled nodes all serve unique purposes despite being shared, and I am unable to create a subcircuit because of this feature. At least this feature should be a toggleable option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: