Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs don't mention that docusign_template_id is required #49

Open
smcoll opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

docs don't mention that docusign_template_id is required #49

smcoll opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@smcoll
Copy link
Contributor

smcoll commented Nov 6, 2015

i see the docusign_template_id exists on the SignatureType model in the demo, but the backend itself references this property that won't exist on an existing model unless explicitly added. This results in an AttributeError. Perhaps the docs ought to mention this, or perhaps the backend should handle cases where it doesn't exist, which seems sufficient given that the model field in the demo accepts empty strings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant