-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keep the user-facing UI simple #2
Comments
Edit: basically as you said "all the fields are filled", so there is no need to show them to the user at all, the user only needs the pack url and game directory fields. |
Yeah that makes sense, though for anything other than Fabric it will need a dropdown to select the version to use (and installer link) since I don't automate Forge installs. I will still have a more options button since I think there are still cases where it's useful to configure the loader/version/launcher path. |
Just a random person who will use this tuning in. I like the idea of simplifying the UI for people I would have to teach to use this, but what comp500 had first time around would be invaluable in pack development. It would allow me to install the same pack side by side, but bump a version and test it. This is huge and opens the door for easily doing a lot of best practices QA/dev wise. Also, some people may use launchers that use weird layouts and might need to be able to have more flexibility to overcome the lack of direct support for each use case by being able to specify paths. So I have a strong strong strong flag in the race to not have things /removed/ but hidden under advanced interfaces. |
Reposting a previously suggested idea to keep track of it:
The user-facing UI should be simple, similar to Fabric, Forge, Optifine installers.
That could potentially be done with URL parameters, e.g.
https://packwiz-site.example/?pack=https://example.com/pack.toml
The installer should also display the name of the modpack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: