Build | Status |
---|---|
macOS 10.15 GitHub action | [![Build Status]() |
Homebrew tap for osrf simulation software
To use:
brew tap osrf/simulation
brew install ignition-citadel
- ignition_cmake2
- ignition_tools1
- ignition_utils1
- ignition_math6
- ignition_common4
- ignition_msgs8
- ignition_fuel-tools7
- ignition_plugin1
- ignition_transport11
- sdformat12
- ignition_physics5
- ignition_rendering6
- ignition_gui6
- ignition_sensors6
- ignition_gazebo6
- ignition_launch5
- ignition_fortress
- ignition_cmake2
- ignition_tools1
- ignition_math6
- ignition_common3
- ignition_msgs5
- ignition_fuel-tools4
- ignition_plugin1
- ignition_transport8
- sdformat9
- ignition_physics2
- ignition_rendering3
- ignition_gui3
- ignition_sensors3
- ignition_gazebo3
- ignition_launch2
- ignition_citadel
The https://build.osrfoundation.org jenkins instance is used for building bottles with the following job (configured in brew_release.dsl):
This jenkins job is triggered for pull requests when an administrator makes a comment
on the pull request that includes the phrase build bottle
.
The job should appear in the GitHub build status interface for the latest commit:
For example, #1157 was created after running our release.py script and this comment triggered the bottle build, resulting in a successful bottle upload and a4793387.
Bottle builds are not triggered automatically for every pull request for several reasons:
- Not all pull requests require a bottle to be rebuilt (such as #1007 that added this text to the README)
- Successful bottle builds result in binary artifacts being immediately uploaded to our hosting provider
so pull requests should be screened for malicious intent by administrators before triggering
a bottle build.
- This process differs from the approach taken by homebrew/homebrew-core whose bottles are hosted at GitHub Packages, which hosts files according to the hash of their contents rather than by filename. The homebrew-core CI jobs will build bottles for any incoming pull request, which will upload bottles directly to GitHub Packages, but the SHA hash associated with these bottles will not be easily available unless the pull request is merged by a homebrew maintainer.
When a new major or minor version of a formula is merged to homebrew-core that is a dependency of formulae
in this tap, it may break our bottles, requiring a rebuild (see
#1728 or
#1708 for example).
As the osrf/simulation bottles will be broken immediately upon the merge in homebrew-core,
it can be useful to disable the broken bottles while waiting for new bottles to be rebuilt.
The --remove-bottle-block
parameter to brew bump-revision
can be used in this instance.
For example, the bottle removals from
8ca61f3d
in #1742 could be repeated with
the following commands:
brew bump-revision --remove-bottle-block ignition-msgs1
brew bump-revision --remove-bottle-block ignition-msgs5
brew bump-revision --remove-bottle-block ignition-msgs6
brew bump-revision --remove-bottle-block ignition-msgs7
brew bump-revision --remove-bottle-block ignition-msgs8
-
Does a new bottle need to be built for every homebrew pull request?
- A new bottle is not needed for all pull requests.
For example, updates to documentation or a formula's
test do
block do not change the installed binary and thus don't require a new bottle. Changing the tarballurl
, adding patches, or bumping the formularevision
do require new bottles. If you aren't sure, just ask in the pull request.
- A new bottle is not needed for all pull requests.
For example, updates to documentation or a formula's
-
Do I need to wait for the
brew test-bot / test-bot
GitHub action to succeed for starting a bottle build?- No, you don't need to wait. You can start the bottle build as soon as the pull request is opened.
-
When can I merge a pull request? Does CI need to be finished?
- Yes, CI must be finished and successful. If a new bottle is needed, the
generic-release-homebrew_triggered_bottle_builder
job must be successful as well.
- Yes, CI must be finished and successful. If a new bottle is needed, the
-
I commented
build bottle
, but it did not start a generic-release-homebrew_triggered_bottle_builder job.- Confirm that the build.osrfoundation.org web page loads. If it is not accessible, an OSRF build farmer should be notified.
- If build.osrfoundation.org is operational,
confirm that you have adequate permissions.
Currently, you must be a member of the github.com/ignitionrobotics
org in order to use the
build bottle
trigger phrase (see configuration in brew_release.dsl).
-
I'm updating a Formula to build from a specific commit in a git repository. How do I get the
sha256
for the tarball corresponding to that commit?- First, make sure that you have updated the url to use the commit hash that corresponds to the commit in the repository that you'd like to use.
Also be sure to update the version, if it exists (in the example linked here,
20201028~c02cd0
is the part that needs to be modified:20201028
is the date (year-month-day), andc02cd0
is the first 6 characters of the commit was used in the updated url). - Now, run the command
wget <url>
, where<url>
is the updated url that was just mentioned. Once you have thetar
file downloaded, run the commandsha256sum <file>
, replacing<file>
with the file that was downloaded viawget
. Thesha256
will be printed to the console, which can then be used to update the Formula's sha256.
- First, make sure that you have updated the url to use the commit hash that corresponds to the commit in the repository that you'd like to use.
Also be sure to update the version, if it exists (in the example linked here,
-
I ran the release.py script multiple times for the same release and commented
build bottle
on the pull request, but the bottle building job failed, with console output containing the textWarning: Formula reports different SHA256:
.- It's possible that the tarball uploaded at the time the pull request was created was overwritten
by a subsequent call to
release.py
(see ignition-tooling/release-tools#274). If so, update thesha256
field for the tarball (see #1156 and 57fa5defcce for an example).
- It's possible that the tarball uploaded at the time the pull request was created was overwritten
by a subsequent call to
The generic-release-homebrew_triggered_bottle_builder
jenkins job currently builds bottles for macOS 10.15 catalina
and 10.16 big_sur
using the following job configurations and the
homebrew_bottle_creation.bash
script:
- https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/generic-release-homebrew_triggered_bottle_builder/label=osx_catalina
- https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/generic-release-homebrew_triggered_bottle_builder/label=osx_bigsur
If the bottle building job finishes without errors for each build configuration,
it will trigger a subsequent repository_uploader_packages
job that uploads the bottles to s3
and a generic-release-homebrew_pr_bottle_hash_updater
job that commits the changes in bottle sha256
values to the pull request branch
using this script.
When we add support for a new version of macOS, we need to build bottles for that formula,
while ideally keeping the existing bottles. This can be done by using the --keep-old
parameter with brew test-bot
and brew bottle
.
Since ignition-tooling/release-tools#556,
bottle builds can be triggered for a specified version of macOS using --keep-old
by adding special tags to the build bottle
comment in a homebrew-simulation pull request.
Use brew-bot-tag:
along with build-for-new-distro-{distro}
in the comment,
where {distro}
is the version string used in homebrew bottle blocks
(such as catalina
or big_sur
). See this comment
in osrf/homebrew-simulation#1694
as an example that triggered a bottle build for big_sur
only.
Note that the --keep-old
flag only works if the pull request does not change the
formula version. Adding a comment to a formula (as in
osrf/homebrew-simulation#1694)
is sufficient.