Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi there, The main difference you're seeing is because the GMAT setup includes the JGM2 gravity field with a 4x4 but the setup un Nyx does not. You'll want to setup the propagator similar to how it's done here: nyx/tests/mission_design/orbitaldyn.rs Line 893 in 2c4facb I hope this helps. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, I have some questions on the propagator validation / accuracy.
I have the following Input Vector:
{
epoch: 1672562471200, // 2023-01-01T08:41:11.200Z
px: 4023.3885631619813,
py: 2295.3829421046115,
pz: -5048.048507712205,
vx: 5.505020806246804,
vy: 1.4725984148977468,
vz: 5.061557060430501
}
And this code:
Nyx prorogaties this over 14642397 milliseconds. It returns this Vector:
┌ ┐
│ -6157.447144534038 │
│ -2627.8513244002433 │
│ 1375.397964296156 │
│ -1.803803312859318 │
│ .3201275241241115 │
│ -7.417566789943529 │
└ ┘
When I run this same state vector through RK89 Propogation in GMAT, with, what I believe are the same settings (attached). I get this Vector:
Screenshot 2023-06-26 at 9 51 47 PM
┌ ┐
│ -6120.747335306143 │
│ -2656.585734678817 │
│ 1539.019862109160 │
│ -1.968968660807117 │
│ .2413706536038857 │
│ -7.368889935403013 │
│ -6120.747335306419 │
│ -2656.585734677576 │
│ 1539.019862111372 │
│ -1.968968660809157 │
│ .2413706536033870 │
│ -7.368889935402240 │
└ ┘
Am I setting up my NYX propagator wrong? What could be generating these deviations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions