Skip to content

Commit 568f450

Browse files
committed
Add links to CSSWG issue
1 parent ed51858 commit 568f450

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-1
lines changed

site/src/pages/components/interest-invokers.explainer.mdx

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Many different options for providing touchscreen support were discussed and even
164164

165165
#### The `::interest-button` pseudo element
166166

167-
This is "Option 3.5" in the [Touchscreen options](#touchscreen-options) section. Adding an item to the long-press context menu meets the use case of ensuring all users have access to hovercard content. However, it is a bit more difficult to discover and use. In some cases, developers might want to provide a more visible way to show the user that there is more content to access. Importantly, in other cases, developers (or more often *designers*) explicitly do not want this - they want to keep an uncluttered page layout without extra affordances.
167+
This is "Option 3.5" in the [Touchscreen options](#touchscreen-options) section, and is discussed in [CSSWG issue 12437](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12437). Adding an item to the long-press context menu meets the use case of ensuring all users have access to hovercard content. However, it is a bit more difficult to discover and use. In some cases, developers might want to provide a more visible way to show the user that there is more content to access. Importantly, in other cases, developers (or more often *designers*) explicitly do not want this - they want to keep an uncluttered page layout without extra affordances.
168168

169169
In the case that the developer wants to add additional visibility, they can opt in to an addition button/icon via the `::interest-button` pseudo element:
170170

@@ -624,3 +624,4 @@ This section links to all of the relevant discussions and issues related to `int
624624
- [CSSWG discussion of the pseudo classes](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12154)
625625
- [(OpenUI) Don't use interestfor for modal dialogs](https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/1093)
626626
- [(OpenUI) We don't need an interestaction attribute](https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/1064)
627+
- [The ::interest-button pseudo element](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12437)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)