Olive Release Notes

[pdpinch]

Olive Release Notes.

part of openedx/wg-build-test-release#229

Date Needed (optional)

Nutmeg will be released on Decmber 9, 2022

Reviewers

Possible roles follow. The PR submitter checks the boxes after each reviewer finishes and gives 👍.

• Subject matter expert: @sarina
• Subject matter expert: @feanil
• Subject matter expert: @nedbat
• Subject matter expert: @kdmccormick
• Subject matter expert: @ghassanmas
• Doc team review (sanity check, copy edit, or dev edit?): @edx/doc
• Product review: @jmakowski1123
• PM review: n/a (Is a PM different from Product Review?)

@blarghmatey @shaidar @shellyu @cachob

Testing

• Ran ./run_tests.sh without warnings or errors

HTML Version (optional)

• Build an RTD draft for your branch: https://edx--2093.org.readthedocs.build/projects/open-edx-release-notes/en/2093/olive.html

Sandbox (optional)

• https://olive.demo.overhang.io/

Post-review

• Add a comment with the description of this change or link this PR to the next release notes task.
• Squash commits

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @pdpinch! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[arbrandes]

These are great, thanks a lot @pdpinch!

I made a couple of totally optional suggestions, but there are a couple of changes I'm actually asking for. (Hopefully the distinction is clear in context.)

[arbrandes]

Suggestion: maybe we should explicitly mention that Credentials needs to be installed and running for the LRMFE to work?

[sarina]

What is the Learner Records MFE?

[kdmccormick]

+1, would love to see some more info here so that operators would know what they'd be changing by enabling the LRMFE. I have a vague understanding that the MFE is incrementally replacing some legacy pages from Crededentials (and LMS too?), but I don't know enough to write the blurb myself.

@hurtstotouchfire would you be able to suggest a sentence or two on what the LRMFE adds to Olive?

[pdpinch]

@arbrandes @ghassanmas @regisb I added a brief section on the MFE runtime config to breaking changes. Let me know if it's too much.

https://edx--2093.org.readthedocs.build/projects/open-edx-release-notes/en/2093/olive.html#mfe-settings-are-no-longer-supported-in-tutor-configuration

I also accepted Adolfo's "upgrade note"

https://edx--2093.org.readthedocs.build/projects/open-edx-release-notes/en/2093/olive.html#upgrade-note

[arbrandes]

Suggested fixes to my earlier suggestions. Otherwise, looks great to me!

[sarina]

@pdpinch where do you use the en_us/open_edx_release_notes/images/olive/page_and_resources_view.png file? I want to know more about that change

Sorry I meant en_us/open_edx_release_notes/images/palm/new_ora_grading_experience.png

[openedx-webhooks]

@pdpinch 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.

[pdpinch]

Thanks for the approval @kdmccormick -- I needed that before I could merge.

[sarina]

@pdpinch I see you removed en_us/open_edx_release_notes/images/palm/new_ora_grading_experience.png - is that because the change didn't go into the release? (I'm writing blog posts and this seems interesting, if included)