[exporter/elasticsearchexporter/internal/lru]: Report for failed tests on main

[github-actions]

Auto-generated report for __run_3 job build.

Link to failed build: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/actions/runs/17393601083

Test Failures

• TestLRUSetLifeTime

=== RUN   TestLRUSetLifeTime
    lruset_test.go:67: 
        	Error Trace:	D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/exporter/elasticsearchexporter/internal/lru/lruset_test.go:67
        	Error:      	"99.987ms" is not greater than or equal to "100ms"
        	Test:       	TestLRUSetLifeTime
--- FAIL: TestLRUSetLifeTime (0.20s)

Note: Information about any subsequent build failures that happen while
this issue is open, will be added as comments with more information to this issue.

[github-actions]

Pinging code owners for exporter/elasticsearch: @JaredTan95 @carsonip @lahsivjar. See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. For example, comment '/label priority:p2 -needs-triaged' to set the priority and remove the needs-triaged label.

[carsonip]

@mx-psi I looked at the failed build and I only see the following. Did it print the flaky test output elsewhere?

Running target 'test-with-junit-and-cover' in module 'exporter/elasticsearchexporter' as part of group 'exporter-1'
C:/mingw64/bin/make --no-print-directory -C exporter/elasticsearchexporter test-with-junit-and-cover
mkdir -p D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/coverage
mkdir -p D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/internal/tools/testresults
D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/.tools/gotestsum --rerun-fails=1 --packages="./..." --junitfile D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/internal/tools/testresults/github.com-open-telemetry-opentelemetry-collector-contrib-exporter-elasticsearchexporter-junit.xml -- -race -timeout 600s -parallel 4 --tags="" ./... -cover -covermode=atomic -test.gocoverdir="D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/coverage"
∅  internal/datapoints (528ms) (coverage: 0.0% of statements)
∅  internal/logging (14ms) (coverage: 0.0% of statements)
✓  internal/elasticsearch (1.059s) (coverage: 81.8% of statements)
✓  internal/exphistogram (1.071s) (coverage: 90.3% of statements)
✓  internal/lru (1.28s) (coverage: 92.9% of statements)
∅  internal/metricgroup (12ms) (coverage: 0.0% of statements)
✓  internal/metadata (1.2s) (coverage: 85.2% of statements)
✓  . (5.582s) (coverage: 83.4% of statements)
✓  internal/metadatatest (1.138s) (coverage: 87.5% of statements)
∅  internal/pool (22ms) (coverage: 0.0% of statements)
∅  internal/serializer (25ms) (coverage: 0.0% of statements)
✓  internal/objmodel (1.139s) (coverage: 75.7% of statements)
✓  internal/serializer/otelserializer (1.3s) (coverage: 76.8% of statements)
✓  internal/serializer/otelserializer/serializeprofiles (1.164s) (coverage: 89.5% of statements)

DONE 420 tests in 10.675s
Running target 'test-with-junit-and-cover' in module 'exporter/elasticsearchexporter/integrationtest' as part of group 'exporter-1'
C:/mingw64/bin/make --no-print-directory -C exporter/elasticsearchexporter/integrationtest test-with-junit-and-cover
mkdir -p D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/coverage
mkdir -p D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/internal/tools/testresults
D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/.tools/gotestsum --rerun-fails=1 --packages="./..." --junitfile D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/internal/tools/testresults/github.com-open-telemetry-opentelemetry-collector-contrib-exporter-elasticsearchexporter-integrationtest-junit.xml -- -race -timeout 600s -parallel 4 --tags="" ./... -cover -covermode=atomic -test.gocoverdir="D:/a/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/coverage"
✓  . (2m51.159s) (coverage: 74.7% of statements)

For the flakiness, I assumed assert.Eventually(t, f, timeout, tick) or the lru implementation would actually wait for at least the timeout but apparently this assumption is wrong.