Update and rename 2026-01-14-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md to 2026-01-15-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md

Author: yaseminaltinay

…/2026-01-14-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md …/2026-01-15-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.mdcontent/blog/2026/2026-01-14-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md renamed to content/blog/2026/2026-01-15-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md content/blog/2026/2026-01-14-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md renamed to content/blog/2026/2026-01-15-Menstrual-Leave-Policy-en.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ type: post
 layout: post
 featured: yellow
 title: 'Menstrual Leave Policy'
-publishedDate: 2026-01-14
+publishedDate: 2026-01-15
 ---
 **[taz](https://taz.de/Geschlechtergerechte-Arbeitswelt/!6143993/) newspaper reported on OKF: In many countries and companies, there is a debate about whether menstrual pain and cycle-related discomfort should be recognised as grounds for additional days off as part of a gender-equitable working environment.** Such regulations exist in some countries by law (e.g. in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan) and voluntarily in many companies. **We have had this model in place since 2021, anchored in our Menstrual Leave Policy. We spoke to Sonja Fischbauer, our organisational developer, about it.**