You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is my first time working with schemas, so hopefully everything is working out. This is my first draft of a historical officers schema. 0f7ee3f It should be a list of terms, with each term having a list of officers. Currently, each term has just one array of officers in general, but I am wondering whether it would be better to have a list of GMs, a list of SMs, (and then optional lists of DGMs, DSMs, committee heads). With that approach, if there are further changes to officer structure, this schema would have to be updated as well (but that probably isn't too much work...).
The .yaml and everything else is not done yet.
What are your thoughts?
Don't be afraid to make a proper PR and list me as a reviewer! It doesn't have to be perfect at all, but it makes it easier to have a comment/revision cycle.
See ocf.io/d/85. This would be used on our officers page and would be the new canonical source of "who is gm/sm currently"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: