From e099c8536dae8ef36a167afc11d7148836b5e814 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Omar Santos Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 10:50:41 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update 2023-01-18.md --- meeting_minutes/2023/2023-01-18.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meeting_minutes/2023/2023-01-18.md b/meeting_minutes/2023/2023-01-18.md index 5223aae74..43298557a 100644 --- a/meeting_minutes/2023/2023-01-18.md +++ b/meeting_minutes/2023/2023-01-18.md @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ Note: Observers of this committee that are ready to become Members should follow - Thomas Schmidt: would like to take the one with the best outcome in quickest time. - Starting from scratch from ISO is hard, ITU too but Duncan can help with that process. - Stefan is looking for the approach that would make more sense for the TC. -- ITU standards are free and translations into many languages are too. ISO standards are typically behind a paywall. +- ITU standards are free and translations into many languages are too. In case we submit CSAF v2.0 to ISO/IEC it will also be free but will not be translated. +- Stefan mentioned that translations of CSAF may be problematic despite their marketing value. - ITU translates the standard in multiple languages and that may be good for awareness and adoption. - ISO references shared during the meeting: - https://www.iso.org/standard/81870.html @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ Note: Observers of this committee that are ready to become Members should follow **Email Threads with Additional Information** from James Bryce Clark, General Counsel, OASIS: - https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/email/archives/202301/msg00005.html - https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/email/archives/202301/msg00004.html +- https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/email/archives/202301/msg00003.html ## Next Steps - The TC will decide to go with ITU or ISO during next week's meeting.