Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boolean operations should be lazily evaluated #1037

Open
christianp opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Boolean operations should be lazily evaluated #1037

christianp opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Difficult! Issues that will take a long time to implement, or involve big breaking changes

Comments

@christianp
Copy link
Member

For example, false and expr shouldn't cause expr to be evaluated.

@nickdip
Copy link

nickdip commented Sep 2, 2023

Hi @christianp, I'm a mathematics teacher who has been learning python for the last year and trying to improve my software development skills - I'm quite interested in helping with this project where I can (with python and maths questions), although this is the first time I'd ever be (trying) to contribute to an open source project! Could you explain in more detail what the issue is, as python should be evaluating the boolean operations in the code by default?

@christianp christianp added the Difficult! Issues that will take a long time to implement, or involve big breaking changes label Sep 5, 2023
@christianp
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @nickdip, thanks for offering to help.
The Numbas runtime is written in JavaScript, not Python. And this problem will take a lot of careful thought to resolve - I think really it has to be me who does that.

Have a look at the issues tagged "good first issue" for tasks you might be able to take on, and read our guidelines on contributing code to Numbas.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Difficult! Issues that will take a long time to implement, or involve big breaking changes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants