Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I think you don't need jest 🥸 #406

Open
Valexr opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

I think you don't need jest 🥸 #406

Valexr opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Valexr
Copy link

Valexr commented Nov 16, 2024

Jest very complicated & heavy...
Try light & simple UVU test runner.

I think it's enough for Nue philosophy 🤓 & I can help make simple changes for all tests...

@Valexr Valexr added improvement new feature New feature or request labels Nov 16, 2024
@nobkd
Copy link
Collaborator

nobkd commented Nov 17, 2024

We have jest only as secondary test runner.
We primarily use Bun as test runner, and just use jest to test Node compatibility.
Using jest allows using the same test syntax, and it has feature parity.

I can check out uvu, if it has the available features, and some compatibility layer for syntax, but I don't know if it fits our use case. :)
(of course would be good if we could have a smaller data and resource footprint on that)

I think I'll try taking a closer look sometime next week.

@Valexr
Copy link
Author

Valexr commented Nov 17, 2024

Oh didn't consider that bun has a test runner...🤓ok, tx for feedback

@nobkd nobkd added tests and removed new feature New feature or request labels Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants