Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review metgenc NetCDF & CSV readers and unify their configuration for the operators #109

Open
lisakaser opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@lisakaser
Copy link

Sample data set needed
Acceptance criteria:

If we ingest CSV we can still generate UMM-G

@lisakaser lisakaser added this to the Dec-Jan-Feb milestone Dec 5, 2024
@lisakaser
Copy link
Author

Likely same as issue 108

@lisakaser
Copy link
Author

Acceptance criteria and sizing discussion needed

@eigenbeam eigenbeam changed the title Extend MetGenC so Operator can give mapping of what we need from CSV Review metgenc NetCDF & CSV readers and unify their configuration for the operators Mar 6, 2025
@eigenbeam
Copy link
Contributor

eigenbeam commented Mar 6, 2025

Regardless of input data type, the operator can specify parameters that will read values from the collection metadata and granule data to generate the UMM-G & CNM.

The configuration parameters should allow the operator to use consistent configuration parameter names & values independent of the input granule file type (e.g., NetCDF, CSV) & data types (granule geometry in lat/lon or UTM or ...)

@lisakaser
Copy link
Author

This is a 1SP strategy story -> create follow up stories for implementation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants