-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop the corepack package manager strict check when invoked by another process #209
Comments
I'm still against dropping the check in any kind of "by default" behaviour. Using the wrong package manager for the currently installed project is broken and should be fixed upstream. Corepack is the wrong layer for that. |
I have no horse in this race. Out of context this proposal feels a lot stronger than I ever intended for it to be. It was originally presented as just one option along a spectrum of correctness versus pragmatism. It may still be worth considering, but it's entirely reasonable to delay implementation. |
@arcanis I don't know how this can be fixed upstream. For example, today I tried to install
What should I think #57 could solve this but it looks like it was rejected. |
In theory, Yarn 2+ supports dropping the |
Tracking Option 2 proposed by @nathanhammond from #195 (comment) as a separate issue since that issue has been closed
As per 0.15.0, Option 3 has been implemented:
but I guess we can still pursue Option 2 so that Corepack adoption and developer experience would be better
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: