Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
95 lines (90 loc) · 5.69 KB

WrittenReport.md

File metadata and controls

95 lines (90 loc) · 5.69 KB

Our project, Monster Browser, is an incremental game that involves raising, feeding, and training monsters. These monsters will gather food for you--this food can then be used to feed the monsters, making them better at gathering food, or used to purchase new monsters, who you can train, raise, and feed, increasing your overall strength. The members of our team are Fedor "Ted" Kiriakidi, Andrew "Duffman" Duffy, Will "Suspension" Bridges, and Nicolas "There's no 'H' in my name" Karayakaylar. Our app is deployed on http://monster-browser.tkwaffle.site, and the github url is github.com/nicolassims/FinalProject. Our app is deployed and working exactly as intended. That's our story, and we're sticking to it. While working on the project, Ted took the lead role, doing massive amounts of work as a "producer," of sorts, ensuring we met up in a timely fashion, and also almost soloing all aspects of the project that involved twitter integration and authorization. His leadership and competency was also indispensable when it came to fixing some bugs or poor design choices other members of the team didn't catch, being the team member with the best birds-eye view of the project. Nicolas came up with the idea for the app as well as many features, was responsible largely for creating the written parts of the assignment, such as this essay, and the previous one, and also created much of the user interface for monster/user creation, as well as the functions that implement that UI. Will implemented the PATCH methods that allowed for the updating of monsters/users and improved the registration process to prevent duplicate users. He also secured our Twitter development account and pitched the idea of using asynchronous server processes, which became the core idea of one of our experiments as well as a key component of our website. Andy served as a “Co-pilot” for various app functions, assisting Ted in food incrementation and worked to design the “monster shop” component.

As mentioned before, our Project 2 app is a GAME--so we'd hope it entertains. On a more psychological level, though, it's an incremental game, so it's essentially a hack directly into the part of the mind that makes people happy when numbers go up. We would also hope that the variety of monsters and nicknames--as well as the random nature of their selections--would create randomly-generated, dynamically-evolving narratives. What will your farm look like if the first five monsters you get are all dragons named "Jerry?" Well, it's possible.

Our app's concept has not actually changed much since the proposal. We managed to avoid having to scope down our app, as many projects eventually have to, by making any difficult features stretch goals that we didn't actually include in our proposal. We didn't end up including those particular stretch goals, but we did end up including a few features we didn't plan for, such as a user leaderboard, the ability to rename monsters, and an inversely exponential food-gain curve utilizing square roots.

Users interact with the application by creating an account, buying their first monster for 0 food, and then sending it off to either the wild or the farm. Again, the sense of "accomplishment" that a user can achieve through this game is entirely fake--we're appealing directly to one's sense of satisfaction gained from seeing numbers go up. And, as satisfying as that is, it's also explicitly purposeless. But, you know, it is a game. So purposelessness is pretty much the purpose of the thing.

If we were to run through every requirement of the project, and describe how we fulfilled them, it'd look something like this: Obviously, this app is more complicated and ambitious than anything we've done in this class before. Though a somewhat subjective measurement, the fact of the matter is this assignment has a lot more lines of code, and files, than any other. The app is split into two parts, containing an elixir server and a react-based ui. We've deployed the app to Ted Kiriakidi's VPS. User accounts are authenticated with passwords, the encrypted versions of which are kept securely in our database. Users, and Monsters are stored in a postgres database that the app references. The application uses the twitter API, requiring the app to be authenticated, so that users can post to twitter from the app, and the app can check the number of likes on a tweet. Of course, the application uses phoenix channels to push realtime updates to users, and it does this every second, since the core conceit of our game is that it plays itself even if nobody is logged in. And that, incidentally, is the cool thing that our app does--state is kept persistently, and updated constantly, even if there's not a single browser window/command terminal pointed towards the app. So every time you come back to the game, you should be in a much better position than you were before. As for testing... well, we're fairly certain it's tested to completion. I suppose you've got to try and break it, to see if that's true!

The most complex part of the app--and the most significant challenge we faced--is almost certainly the Twitter authentication, which, as mentioned before, Ted essentially soloed. (Although we did practice pair programming! Sometimes even triad programming, and a couple times quad programming.) Ted achieved this through storing the obtained user tokens in the database and only setting the ExTwitter config to use these tokens in the process that calls the Twitter API on their behalf, immediately before the action. Issues faced before the final result included not having the authorization available as well as having the users authorization remain for the wrong API calls.