You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should have docs to compare the two method to annotate the AA muts with suggestions on when to use each method.
This should also point to existing repos as examples that use each method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be great. The major differences I see are that (1) has worse AA alignments due to gap placement, but the AAs are always 1-1 with the nucleotide mutations whereas (2) has better AA alignments but loses the relationship between nuc mutations and corresponding AA mutations, as shown in Auspice.
We currently have two methods for annotating AA muts.
augur ancestral
for NT muts andaugur translate
for AA muts.augur ancestral
to reconstruct AA mutsWe should have docs to compare the two method to annotate the AA muts with suggestions on when to use each method.
This should also point to existing repos as examples that use each method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: