You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Because all interfaces in a port group need to be the same speed, in cases where different speeds are needed on the same switch (e.g. some interfaces SFP+ 10G, some SFP28 25G), planning is needed to ensure only the same speed transceivers & connections are used with interfaces in a given port group.
Therefore it would be useful to be able to view port group : interface mappings to help with the planning of such scenarios, and to validate that this constraint is in the design.
There are sort of a breakout thing, but not using a breakout cable - the "breakout" is within the switch itself.
I looked at modules but I couldn't create the relationship with interfaces. Also tried parent/child interfaces but I couldn't add SFP28 interfaces as a child (came up with the validation error that only virtual interfaces can be child).
I wonder if anyone has a good workaround to manage this scenario?
Or whether a new "port group" component type that maps to interfaces and enforces this constraint is something to request as a new "nice to have" feature? e.g. to:
Add port groups as a component of a device / device type
Map / assign interfaces to a port group
Validate that all interfaces in a given port group are the same speed
View a list of port groups on a device, the interfaces contained within, and what those interfaces are connected to
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Dell PowerSwitch (https://www.dell.com/support/manuals/en-sg/dell-emc-smartfabric-os10/smartfabric-os-user-guide-10-5-0/port-groups-on-s5200f-on-switches?guid=guid-1a9f6680-ab7e-4cfa-9c94-96cf3b436f8c&lang=en-us) and maybe others have a concept of port groups, which are fixed into the physical design of the switch.
Because all interfaces in a port group need to be the same speed, in cases where different speeds are needed on the same switch (e.g. some interfaces SFP+ 10G, some SFP28 25G), planning is needed to ensure only the same speed transceivers & connections are used with interfaces in a given port group.
Therefore it would be useful to be able to view
port group : interface
mappings to help with the planning of such scenarios, and to validate that this constraint is in the design.There are sort of a breakout thing, but not using a breakout cable - the "breakout" is within the switch itself.
I looked at modules but I couldn't create the relationship with interfaces. Also tried parent/child interfaces but I couldn't add SFP28 interfaces as a child (came up with the validation error that only virtual interfaces can be child).
I wonder if anyone has a good workaround to manage this scenario?
Or whether a new "port group" component type that maps to interfaces and enforces this constraint is something to request as a new "nice to have" feature? e.g. to:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions