You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're not referencing either of these right now. If we do, I think it would require a bit more explanation, rather than just rendering the values of those properties.
For example projected: true might need to read: "This layer must use a projected coordinate system (as opposed to a geographic coordinate system)."
And different_projections_ok might translate to a statement like, "spatial layers must all use the same coordinate system", or "spatial layers may use different coordinate systems so long as all layers have a well-defined coordinate system".
I don't think we need a statement about args_with_spatial_overlap -- it kind of goes without saying.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is the
projected
property of an arg:And then there is the
different_projections_ok
property:We're not referencing either of these right now. If we do, I think it would require a bit more explanation, rather than just rendering the values of those properties.
For example
projected: true
might need to read: "This layer must use a projected coordinate system (as opposed to a geographic coordinate system)."And
different_projections_ok
might translate to a statement like, "spatial layers must all use the same coordinate system", or "spatial layers may use different coordinate systems so long as all layers have a well-defined coordinate system".I don't think we need a statement about
args_with_spatial_overlap
-- it kind of goes without saying.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: