You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Xi Chen, Yan Duan, Rein Houthooft, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, Pieter Abbeel
UC Berkeley, OpenAI
What is this
Present a simple modification to the generative adversarial network objective that encourages it to learn interpretable and meaningful representations.
Maximizing the mutual information between fixed small subset of the GAN's noise variables and the observations
Comparison with previous researches. What are the novelties/good points?
No supervision of any kind
Key points
z in the GAN. In this paper, they decompose the input noise vector into two parts:
z, which is treated as source of incompressible noise
c, which we will call the latent code and will target the salient structured semantic features of the data distribution
GAN's minimax game formalization
InfoGAN's formulation where I is a mutual information
How the author proved effectiveness of the proposal?
Experiments on MNIST, CelebA, and SVHN
Two goals
If mutual information can be maximized efficiently
To evaluate if InfoGAN can learn disentangled and interpretable representations
Confirmed by making use of the generator to vary only one latent factor at a time in order to assess if varying such factor results in only one type of semantic variation in generated iamges
Summary
Link
Author/Institution
Xi Chen, Yan Duan, Rein Houthooft, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, Pieter Abbeel
UC Berkeley, OpenAI
What is this
Comparison with previous researches. What are the novelties/good points?
Key points
z in the GAN. In this paper, they decompose the input noise vector into two parts:
GAN's minimax game formalization
![スクリーンショット 2021-12-12 18 20 37](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2190811/145742497-f44e1b90-b26e-43bf-bae1-3aea8d40d740.png)
InfoGAN's formulation where I is a mutual information
![スクリーンショット 2021-12-12 18 20 46](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2190811/145742537-9476e175-cd21-471e-a6c9-7c4609a0e329.png)
How the author proved effectiveness of the proposal?
Any discussions?
What should I read next?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: