Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug: lose strict check option #86

Open
bigbigDreamer opened this issue Feb 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Bug: lose strict check option #86

bigbigDreamer opened this issue Feb 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
@bigbigDreamer @myNameIsDu
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@bigbigDreamer
Copy link
Collaborator

image
@bigbigDreamer bigbigDreamer added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 25, 2023
@myNameIsDu
Copy link
Owner

sorry, i don't understand,where is this option

@bigbigDreamer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sorry, i don't understand,where is this option

you can check this line

@myNameIsDu
Copy link
Owner

it's ok, because the type is "boolean | Record<string,any>"

@bigbigDreamer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

it's ok, because the type is "boolean | Record<string,any>"

The function only handle the boolean type, when I use number？symbol? set......

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bigbigDreamer bigbigDreamer

@myNameIsDu myNameIsDu

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bigbigDreamer @myNameIsDu