Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Dynamic learn-ahead card count #166

Open
Naggischnulu opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

[FEATURE] Dynamic learn-ahead card count #166

Naggischnulu opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
idea New or something to think about new feature New feature or request requires discussion Either complex, underdeveloped, or possibly contentious

Comments

@Naggischnulu
Copy link

The number of Kanji per day is inconsistent
I've set my learn-ahead card count to 7, which results in a range of kanji per day from 0 to 30, based on the vocab im trying to learn. That means I'm sometimes overworked and sometimes underworked.

Dynamic learn-ahead card count
The learn-ahead card count should be linked to a target kanji-per-day count, e.g. 10. Based on this the learn-ahead card count should be automatically set.

Additional Info
The selected number should be communicated so that one learns accordingly many vocab cards.

@Naggischnulu Naggischnulu added idea New or something to think about new feature New feature or request requires discussion Either complex, underdeveloped, or possibly contentious labels Jul 7, 2022
@RicBent
Copy link
Contributor

RicBent commented Jul 8, 2022

Interesting.

There is a single problem with this system though: What would happen if your learn ahead card amount is set too low, causing some kanji to be skipped.

Instead of solving that problem, maybe the current system could just be expanded to average out card creation, fixing the root issue of uneven workload. Might run some experiments on this~

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
idea New or something to think about new feature New feature or request requires discussion Either complex, underdeveloped, or possibly contentious
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants