Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Enhance Test Logging and Encryption Options #478

Open
Grant-Archibald-MS opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature]: Enhance Test Logging and Encryption Options #478

Grant-Archibald-MS opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Grant-Archibald-MS
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

In scenarios where multiple tests are run, it is challenging to determine the order of test results. Additionally, there is a need to include the date and time in the folder name for better organization. The current ILogger implementation does not the date and time of each log entry is also necessary to help diagnose issues.

To help with test issue resolution consider adding logging for key test parameters such as requested resource, persona name, and persona email (if known) is required.

Lastly, there can be cases where there is need to secure log files, including the ability to provide options encrypt log files on Windows using Data Protection APIs or support for the ability to provide encryption key to ensure files at rest are encrypted.

Describe the solution you'd like

The solution should include:
- Determining the order of test results when multiple tests are run.
- Including the date and time in the folder name.
- Enhancing the ILogger to include the date and time of each log entry.
- Logging key test parameters such as requested resource, persona name, and persona email (if known).
- Securing log files by providing the ability to encrypt log files on Windows using DAPI.
- Supporting the ability to supply an encryption key to ensure files at rest are encrypted.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context?

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant