-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Investigate OSCAL for supplementing requirements model #52
Comments
https://www.metanorma.com/author/topics/document-format/requirements-recommendations-permissions/ : documentation of what we have https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-requirements-models: formal model, UML and RNC grammar |
URL update for OSCAL sample: I guess the second URL is now: |
OSCAL structure: METADATA -> contains "role", "party", "responsible-party" (can also contain "prop" and "link"), and attributes "title", "last-modified", "version" and "oscal-version"
GROUP -> contains "control" and attributes "title", "class" and "id"
BACK-MATTER -> contains "resource", "citation"
IMPORT -> contains "include" and uses "href" attribute (e.g. '#catalog')
MERGE
MODIFY -> contains "alter"
|
Wow. Thank you @anermina. I don't have the headspace to investigate this now, but this gives me a start. And I can already see that this is radically different to the modelling we have done... |
Under the new thinking, OSCAL represents one way of modeling a requirement. Metanorma should support multiple ways of modeling requirements, and for sure we should support OSCAL. |
No longer a priority |
Sample: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/usnistgov/OSCAL/master/content/nist.gov/SP800-53/rev4/NIST_SP-800-53_rev4_catalog.xml
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: