Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[[email protected]] metanorma contains outdated Ubuntu packages #29

Open
CAMOBAP opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

[[email protected]] metanorma contains outdated Ubuntu packages #29

CAMOBAP opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@CAMOBAP
Copy link
Contributor

CAMOBAP commented Dec 8, 2022

A scan of this snap shows that it was built with packages from the Ubuntu
archive that have since received security updates. The following lists new
USNs for affected binary packages in each snap revision:

Revision r131 (amd64; channels: candidate)

  • libasn1-8-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libgssapi3-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libhcrypto4-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libheimbase1-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libheimntlm0-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libhx509-5-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libkrb5-26-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libroken18-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libwind0-heimdal: 5766-1

Revision r132 (amd64; channels: stable)

  • libasn1-8-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libgssapi3-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libhcrypto4-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libheimbase1-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libheimntlm0-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libhx509-5-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libkrb5-26-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libroken18-heimdal: 5766-1
  • libwind0-heimdal: 5766-1

Simply rebuilding the snap will pull in the new security updates and
resolve this. If your snap also contains vendored code, now might be a
good time to review it for any needed updates.

Thank you for your snap and for attending to this matter.

@CAMOBAP CAMOBAP self-assigned this Dec 8, 2022
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

Do we also need to build a snap for armv8 and aarch64?

@CAMOBAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

CAMOBAP commented Dec 8, 2022

I think we can.

BTW armv8 is probably the same as aarch64. Should we need to support aarch32 too?

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

Cool, probably no need for 32 bit.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

A reminder for this issue from Ubuntu:

A scan of this snap shows that it was built with packages from the Ubuntu
archive that have since received security updates. The following lists new
USNs for affected binary packages in each snap revision:

Revision r131 (amd64; channels: candidate)

  • libcurl3-gnutls: 5788-1

Revision r133 (amd64; channels: stable)

  • libcurl3-gnutls: 5788-1

Simply rebuilding the snap will pull in the new security updates and
resolve this. If your snap also contains vendored code, now might be a
good time to review it for any needed updates.

Thank you for your snap and for attending to this matter.

References:

@CAMOBAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

CAMOBAP commented Mar 12, 2023

Depends on metanorma/packed-mn#141

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants