You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As noted in #4248 there are several parts of set.mm with bad theorems, so this issue is about one "family" of them: those using ax-riotaBAD (~2.8% of set.mm)
https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/ax-riotaBAD.html
As noted in #4248 there are several parts of set.mm with bad theorems, so this issue is about one "family" of them: those using ax-riotaBAD (~2.8% of set.mm)
This axiom is only used in https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/riotaclbgBAD.html, where the inconsistency with set.mm is in the reverse direction. I'd expect that most of the time, deeper in the dependency chain (for instance https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/glbconN.html), it should be possible to just prove uniqueness directly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: