Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up and standardize surface dictionary inputs and format #160

Open
johnjasa opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Clean up and standardize surface dictionary inputs and format #160

johnjasa opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@johnjasa
Copy link
Member

With the introduction of a few more components and options, the surface dictionary has now become unruly, especially when using the wingbox or full set of options.

We need to either document this fully, have a simple example that explain what all the values are, or switch to using OM options dictionary. Maybe all of these would be effective.

@johnjasa johnjasa added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Aug 22, 2018
@johnjasa johnjasa modified the milestones: 2.1.0, 2.2.0 Sep 17, 2018
@johnjasa johnjasa removed this from the 2.2.0 milestone Feb 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant