Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New term request/OOSTT representation: racial category information #250

Open
mbrochhausen opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

New term request/OOSTT representation: racial category information #250

mbrochhausen opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
new term request use this label for issues that include a new term request for the ontology, i.e., new class or OP

Comments

@mbrochhausen
Copy link
Contributor

The TIPTOE project required the term "racial category information (content entity)". This term was already modeled by Emma Chappell during a summer project for OOSTT and is part of the last OOSTT release. We are happy to turn this term over to OMRSE or help create a new term in OMRSE. The current definition in OOSTT is "An information content identity that describes a social categorization of human beings by assumptions based on physical characteristics or their assumed lineage."

Maybe we can discuss this during an OMRSE meeting.
@dexink dexink added the new term request use this label for issues that include a new term request for the ontology, i.e., new class or OP label Oct 2, 2024
@mbrochhausen mbrochhausen changed the title New term request/OOSTT representation New term request/OOSTT representation: racial category information Oct 2, 2024
@CDowland CDowland mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
new term request use this label for issues that include a new term request for the ontology, i.e., new class or OP
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dexink @mbrochhausen