Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature request: combine this and the graphicsmagick buildpacks #7

Open
jonathanong opened this issue Aug 12, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@jonathanong
Copy link

i noticed that the graphicsmagick buildpack is more up to date than this package. why not just combined these two buildpacks into a single buildpack that has both packages and other packages like libpng and zlib? the overhead wouldn't be much, and it'll be easier to maintain.

another option is just to have one be the fork of the other.

@mcollina
Copy link
Owner

This is an awesome idea! Can you submit a pull-request against the graphcis-magick one? We can rebrand as 'heroku-magick-buildpack' and combine both of them.

If you want, I can give you commit access!

@jonathanong
Copy link
Author

i tried using it, but it didn't even build (i forgot which package failed, i think libpng). i updated the package versions manually since i guess the server you download the source code from deletes all old versions (very annoying! but i can't find any other servers). since i don't know shell very well, do you mind just double checking your packages work and updating them? after that i'll try hacking this again. i'm on os x; i'm not sure what you're using.

@mcollina
Copy link
Owner

The build are done directly on Heroku through Vulcan, so it is not bound to a platform.

I think I'll have some time next week: I'll work on the graphicsmagick package, as it is more up-to-date.

azer pushed a commit to teespring-labs/heroku-buildpack-imagemagick that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants