Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mattermost integration allows for moving to On Hold even without mandatory field #142

Open
DHaussermann opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
Type/Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@DHaussermann
Copy link

The integration allows users to set an incident to On-Hold without providing the mandatory reason field.

Steps:

  • Get a subscription to post about an incident
  • Click change status
  • Set the Status to On-Hold
  • Save
  • Return to SN UI
    Observed The status has changed without the mandatory reason

image

This is the only case I saw of the integration side-stepping business logic but conceivably there could be more when ever we change status based on how Service Now is configured.

@DHaussermann DHaussermann added Type/Bug Something isn't working Triage labels Dec 12, 2022
@DHaussermann DHaussermann changed the title Mattermost integration allow for moving to On Hold even without mandatory field Mattermost integration allows for moving to On Hold even without mandatory field Dec 12, 2022
@m1lt0n m1lt0n removed the Triage label Feb 13, 2023
@ayusht2810
Copy link
Contributor

@mickmister @DHaussermann @hanzei @m1lt0n
On exploring this issue, I found that the state value linked with On Hold is configurable through the ServiceNow instance. If we update the state value linked with On Hold, the reason field will come up for that particular state.
image

So what should be the next step we take to resolve the issue?

@ayusht2810
Copy link
Contributor

@DHaussermann @mickmister @hanzei @m1lt0n any updates on this?

@mkdbns mkdbns moved this from Todo to Pending Feedback in Brightscout Plugin Maintenance Jun 12, 2023
@mickmister
Copy link
Contributor

@ayusht2810 Sorry I don't have much context on this. @DHaussermann Any thoughts on this?

@raghavaggarwal2308
Copy link
Contributor

@ayusht2810 Sorry I don't have much context on this. @DHaussermann Any thoughts on this?

@DHaussermann Gentle reminder

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type/Bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: Pending Feedback
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants