You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have obtained hap1.fa and hap2.fa using hifiasm(HiFi +HiC reads). Next, I would like to evaluate the QV and completeness of each haplotype.
However, I am uncertain about which reads to use to build the meryl databases. Should I use haplotype-specific reads or all HiFi reads?
When I use all HiFi reads to assess the QV and completeness of each haplotype, the QV is 48, and the completeness is 90.26%. In contrast, when I use haplotype-specific reads, the QV is 36, and the completeness is 99.40%.
Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use all HiFi reads.
Completeness is measured based on num. kmers found in the assembly / found in the reads. That means, if you are using haplotype-specific reads, your denominator will be only half the genome.
Run merqury with the two fasta files as input - such as merqury.sh read.meryl hap1.fa hap2.fa out.
The QV file will contain QV for each haplotype and all together (both haplotypes).
Hi,
Thank you for developing this nice tool.
I have obtained hap1.fa and hap2.fa using hifiasm(HiFi +HiC reads). Next, I would like to evaluate the QV and completeness of each haplotype.
However, I am uncertain about which reads to use to build the meryl databases. Should I use haplotype-specific reads or all HiFi reads?
When I use all HiFi reads to assess the QV and completeness of each haplotype, the QV is 48, and the completeness is 90.26%. In contrast, when I use haplotype-specific reads, the QV is 36, and the completeness is 99.40%.
Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: