Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not use the softmax to obtain the MLR score? #1

Open
kinredon opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Why not use the softmax to obtain the MLR score? #1

kinredon opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@kinredon
Copy link

Thanks for this interesting work.

This paper uses a normalized score with the sigmoid function to calculate the MLR score.

Why not use the softmax to obtain the MLR score?

@frh23333
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello, this is because one image may have multiple categories. If we use the softmax function, the probability scores will become a one-hot distribution. For example, if there are 2 categories in the image, we hope the output should be like (0.01, 0.01, 0.99, 0.99). But softmax will make it to be like [0, 0, 0.5, 0.5].

@kinredon
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply. I got this.

By the way, one of the baselines of the paper is BoxSup. But in the paper, it is hard to find its reference. Can you share the paper information with me? Thanks!

@frh23333
Copy link
Collaborator

BoxSup is a strong baseline model proposed in the paper of Detic, you can find the detailed introduction in their paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02605

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants