-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anyone train and test on Caltech dataset? #9
Comments
I have trained on caltech, but I can't reproduce the paper's number, my miss rate is 7.4% |
I have the same situation and I am working to find out the reason why the behavior is disappointing on the Caltech dataset. (PyTorch code has a slightly better result on CityPersons dataset than TF) Do you have any idea? I have tried the data hybrid, which is the method that the author of CSP takes in his TF code. However, the MR is still around 8%. |
@lw396285v Would you like to have a look at it? I have been working on this for about a month. I still have no progress. I have tried to use the same normalization, data hybrid and the MR is always around 8-9%. |
If I don't use the training methods in the paper,and let the lr decay to 0.00002 after 50 epochs, the MR is around 5.5% |
what is the batchsize? did you change other configurations besides the train image size and the test image size when you switch from CityPersons to Caltech? |
BS==8 on caltech. image size is the same as in the paper. |
Can you share your train code please? It’s weird I am using bs=12 but |
@msha096 Hi, what's your training config? |
the same as Keras's one. |
Can you share your training strategy? thx |
hi, would you share me with the caltech code, thanks a lot! [email protected] |
请问你是怎么复现的,我这里在编译setup.py文件一种报错,如果可以的话加一下我联系方式775980299,这个问题让我心烦好久了,非常感谢 |
Hi,
Is there anyone train and test on Caltech dataset? My model's MR is around 8-9% however the Keras's version's MR is around 4%. No idea why the MR is not promising. (I did not hybrid the data like Keras, is that the reason??)
Any suggestion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: