-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Entries in electronic resources (prod) #444
Comments
Deployed including the fix 892c33e on dev. As there were other recent updates, please make sure that dev is running properly before we push the changes to production. |
I'm testing everything on dev right now. While editing the boxes in the scan view I can't delete more than one box at a time. If I do, I get a 500 internal server error. Adding and adjusting more than one box is very smooth and I didn't run into problems there. |
Thanks @LauraErhard , CC @chah3d could you have a look regarding the deletion please? |
As far as i could test it, processing the delete requests asynchronously does the trick (accf571). If they still fail there will be a few retries. |
Thanks for your quick work! |
Thank you for your quick response and help, @lgalke and @chah3d. |
I just tested the deleting again. |
@abdelqader-mohammad the scan view was the major change in the dev system right? |
We need to make sure that we update the view only if the back-end call succeeded. Maybe this is not properly reflected in this case. @abdelqader-mohammad I've put my fast comments in the other issues. |
@lgalke Thank you for your comments :) |
The changes regarding the bounding box editing are now on the dev. |
I tried to delete 3 boxes. It works well. |
I can confirm, the deleting runs smoothly now. Thanks everyone! |
Today I noticed, that there are a lot of new entries in the
electronic resource
list, e.g.:Is there a problem with the
external
/valid
settings again?I don't know if there is any correlation but yesterday we set a few journal articles to
Done
, but I think some of these entries were already there the day before that.@abdelqader-mohammad would you please check these entries out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: