You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been experimenting with the Parametric UMAP using the example notebooks. However, I'm encountering an issue where the loss values I'm getting are significantly higher than in notebooks. This has occurred with both the second (02.0-parametric-umap-mnist-embedding-convnet.ipynb) and third (03.0-parametric-umap-mnist-embedding-convnet-with-reconstruction.ipynb) notebooks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for the quick reply. I tested with UMAP versions 0.5.2 and 0.5.3 and obtained the same results as in the notebooks. Starting from version 0.5.4, the results begin to differ. I got exactly the same results as in your keras-umap branch when using newer versions. I was wondering which change is causing this difference.
I've been experimenting with the Parametric UMAP using the example notebooks. However, I'm encountering an issue where the loss values I'm getting are significantly higher than in notebooks. This has occurred with both the second (02.0-parametric-umap-mnist-embedding-convnet.ipynb) and third (03.0-parametric-umap-mnist-embedding-convnet-with-reconstruction.ipynb) notebooks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: