You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for lsquic. now i want move websocket to lsquic. my reqest data is order stream, like open/close micphone .
now i transfer it on same one stream, and donot close this stream, keep it for whole app life for next request data。
is it ok?
another question is when to send the request data to this stream, did i need this? in tcp i can epoll socket for write. in liquic, what can i do? can you show me sample code ? thans for your help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
=== by google
Thanks to lsquic for his work. When migrating from websocket to lsquic, some messages need to be ordered, and some messages are allowed to be out of order. Previously, websockets all sent messages in the same connection. Now using lsquic, how can we ensure that the app changes are minimal, provide the orderliness of some messages, and take advantage of quic's weak network? How should we do it?
My current idea is to encapsulate the lsquic sdk, provide the same socket, the same connection, 1 serial stream, 1-N concurrent streams?
thanks for lsquic. now i want move websocket to lsquic. my reqest data is order stream, like open/close micphone .
now i transfer it on same one stream, and donot close this stream, keep it for whole app life for next request data。
is it ok?
another question is when to send the request data to this stream, did i need this? in tcp i can epoll socket for write. in liquic, what can i do? can you show me sample code ? thans for your help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: