Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] tubearchivist proxy conf #703

Open
1 task done
binarygeek119 opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

[FEAT] tubearchivist proxy conf #703

binarygeek119 opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request no-issue-activity

Comments

@binarygeek119
Copy link

Is this a new feature request?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Wanted change

i need help and would like to have you guys add tubearchivist to the proxy confs
https://github.com/tubearchivist/tubearchivist

Reason for change

its missing

Proposed code change

im not sure what need to be done here.

@binarygeek119 binarygeek119 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 14, 2024
@LinuxServer-CI LinuxServer-CI moved this to Non-Docker Issues in Issue & PR Tracker Oct 14, 2024
@drizuid
Copy link
Member

drizuid commented Oct 17, 2024

HI, I suggest starting with our template we provide then adapt the settings to tubearchivist. Once it's working fully, feel free to PR your change to us. It's hacktoberfest, so if you get it in during october (and signed up) you'll get credit. Otherwise, unless another user submits one, it wont happen. most confs here are contributed by the users of the applications.

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request no-issue-activity
Projects
Status: Non-Docker Issues
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants