Re-upping data contributions

[SamiNorling]

Check in with original O'Keeffe showcase data contributors. If you are tagged as an institutional rep below, please comment on this issue with answers to the following questions (if applicable):

1. Is your institution able/willing to contribute O'Keeffe data to showcase v. 2?
2. If you handled LA json creation/contribution in v. 1, can you do so again for v. 2, reflecting the current LA model? If not, do you want to submit updated source data for @SamiNorling to mock up for the showcase?
3. If @SamiNorling handled json creation from provided source data in v. 1, do you still want me to transform for v.2? And do you want to submit new source data as basis for transformation?

O'Keeffe Showcase v. 1 Data Contributors

• Getty - @azaroth42 (need new contact)
• IMA - @SamiNorling
• Met - @JChoiMMA (@azaroth42 scraped from website for v. 1 - do we need a direct contact?)
• MoMA - @lynnlinked (need new contact - this was a key data set for v. 1)
• NGA - @beaudet
• O'Keeffe - @lizneely (did not contribute data for v. 1 - demoed collection site at workshop - want to contribute data for v. 2?)
• PMA - @jvinegra
• PUAM - @danieltbrennan
• RM - @rasvaan (data submission for v. 1 was never transformed to LA json--an oversight--, but can be for v. 2)
• VAM - @atiro
• YCBA - @edgartdata / @azaroth42
• YUAG - @yervangcohen

(Edited for formatting and clearer instructions.)

[SamiNorling]

IMA

Yes, will contribute updated data to showcase v. 2. I will handle the full contribution (source data and mock-up LA json).

[beaudet]

1. Yes 2. I am interested in leveraging this opportunity to adjust our API to more closely align to the current state of linked art and to provide any relevant data from that updated API as deemed relevant for the effort – the challenge 3. It will be very helpful to be able to submit a data record for analysis / mapping through the alternative weekly meeting process to provide concrete examples for all of the little lurking gems. Perhaps if we could schedule individual institutions for mapping on a week to week basis, that will help to motivate each institution to prepare for the process? Dave

[azaroth42]

Jenni gave the okay to use the data for whatever we wanted. So I think we can check off the Met box, if the scraped / transformed data is useful for anything.

The Getty data is also not up to spec, but again I think should be fine to use. @workergnome ?

[danieltbrennan]

1. Yes, we can provide data for this round
2. I'll update our data/ transformation to reflect the current spec

[rasvaan]

1. Yes (although we don't have to many relevant works)
2. As mentioned in the opening post, this was not done before. @edwardanderson will update the source data and work on the mapping.

[edgartdata]

1. yes
2. we did not provide json the first time around but we can do it this time for the one (!) YCBA item related to O'Keeffe.