Linked Art / Schema.org mapping? #516

azaroth42 · 2023-07-10T15:44:04Z

At Yale we would benefit from a mapping from linked art into schema.org to generate and embed into our LUX entity pages.

e.g. if we could transform the incoming linked art into HTML and schema.org's json-ld to be embedded within the page, when google crawls it (or other systems), the schema.org structured data would make that indexing much stronger.

This seems like a useful result for the community, not just Yale, and something we could collaborate on?

edwardanderson · 2023-07-10T15:49:38Z

Definitely yes! We're mapping our internal Bibframe representations of library resources out to schema.org already and have ambitions to do the same for Linked Art in the future.

azaroth42 · 2023-07-11T20:32:40Z

Some basic mappings to get the ball rolling:

Baseline

/identified_by[type=Name][classified_as/id=PRIMARY_NAME]/content --> /name
/identified_by[type=Name]/content --> /alternateName
/identified_by[type=Identifier]/content --> /identifier
/equivalent/id --> /sameAs
/id --> /url
/referred_to_by[classified_as/id=DESCRIPTION]/content --> /description
/representation/digitally_shown_by/access_point/id --> /image
/subject_of/digitally_carried_by/access_point/id --> /mainEntityOfPage
/classified_as/id --> /additionalType

Person

/born/timespan/begin_of_the_begin --> /birthDate
/born/took_place_at/id --> /birthPlace
/died/timespan/begin_of_the_begin --> /deathDate
/died/took_place_at/id --> /deathPlace
/contact_point[classified_as=EMAIL]/content --> /email
/classified_as[classified_as=GENDER]/id --> /gender
/classified_as[classified_as=OCCUPATION]/id --> /hasOccupation
/residence/id --> /homeLocation
/member_of --> /memberOf
/classified_as[classified_as=NATIONALITY]/id --> /nationality

Group

/contact_point[classified_as=ADDRESS]/content --> /address
/dissolved_by/timespan/begin_of_the_begin --> /dissolutionDate
/formed_by/timespan/begin_of_the_begin --> /foundingDate
/formed_by/took_place_at/id --> /foundingLocation
/formed_by/carried_out_by/id --> /founder
/residence/id --> /location
/member_of --> /memberOf
(If a particular image is known to be a logo, rather than some other representation, use /logo not /image)
/member_of --> /parentOrganization (if known to be hierarchical, rather than some other membership)

Place

/part_of/id --> /containedInPlace
/defined_by --> /geo ; or /latitude and /longitude if a point
(If a particular image is known to be a map, use /hasMap not /image)

Type / Language / Material / Currency

I can't find a good mapping beyond Thing. There is a Language class, but it has no features beyond those of Thing.
There's also Intangible ... but also no properties beyond Thing.

edwardanderson · 2023-07-11T20:37:03Z

Type might map on to schema:DefinedTerm?
~~Currency to schema:StructuredValue?~~

azaroth42 · 2023-07-12T13:37:14Z

DefinedTerm -- I was looking for a way to have a broader or narrower relationship, which I can't see anywhere. Agree that it's probably the closest. inDefinedTermSet is useful (the equivalent of skos:inScheme) but no other Type related notions.

There's a closer fit in terms of properties: https://schema.org/Taxon but not definition as it's explicitly about biological classification.

edwardanderson · 2023-07-12T14:34:04Z

Is skos:narrower somewhat aligned with schema:greater? Although maybe schema:QualitativeValue is too much of a reach?

azaroth42 · 2023-07-12T14:55:19Z

I think greater is more for the relationship between siblings -- the concept of "impossible" is somehow greater than the concept of "easy", but both are narrower than "difficulty"

What about CreativeWork and isPartOf ?

edwardanderson · 2023-07-13T07:12:56Z

Not mapping questions but...

Would we imagine incorporating the schema.org response into the Linked Art API with something like profile selection/negotiation? Or are we thinking more along the lines of making a library for supporting the transformation for unspecified implementations?
Do we have a preference for a particular flavour of serialisation?
- JSON-LD -[XSLT/?]-> JSON-LD
- RDF (any) -[SPARQL CONSTRUCT]-> RDF (any)
- JSON-LD (?) -[?]-> Microdata etc. etc.

edwardanderson · 2023-07-13T07:47:48Z

RE: schema:isPartOf. This works. Class definition might be a bit of a reach.

Could we use AAT page URLs for Types and then use schema:WebPage and schema:relatedLink and just flatten (!) all the hierarchies? Seems bad and lossy and also weird.

aisaac · 2023-07-13T10:06:04Z

Yes schema:greater is no match for the SKOS relationships. And schema:DefinedTerm is the best match for skos:Concept
But maybe we shouldn't devote a lot of time on types/concept to begin with. I'm not sure it's straightforward in Schema.org, as some "types" have made their way to Schema.org as items in instances of schema:Enumeration (https://schema.org/Enumeration) and these instances don't seem to be related to schema:DefinedTerm

bulbil · 2023-07-19T22:59:15Z

A little late to the conversation, but I wanted to mention that we have a workflow that maps linked art to schema.org in (a roundabout way) at the Getty, both in our museum collection pages and archival research collections. But we would love a less ambiguous mapping! We would be most interested in JSON-LD -> JSON-LD mapping.

We index some fields from our linked art LOD to an ElasticSearch index then generate schema.org json from those indexed documents -- below is cribbed from our implementation of Schema.org's Python helpers.

We use the following schema types:

       [
            "CreativeWork",
            "Photograph",
            "Sculpture",
            "Drawing",
            "Painting",
            "Manuscript",
            "Book",
            "Person",
            "Organization",
            "Place"
        ]

Here's some relevant parts of the code, though much of this repeats what has already been discussed above.

    ## add the recipe for validation
    schema.add_property("name", result["primary_name"])
    add_schema_field(schema, "description", "description", result)

    ## person login
    add_schema_field(schema, "birth_place", "birthPlace", result)
    add_schema_field(schema, "born", "birthDate", result)
    add_schema_field(schema, "death_place", "deathPlace", result)
    add_schema_field(schema, "died", "deathDate", result)

    if "accession_number" in result:
        identifiers.append(result["accession_number"])
    if "manuscript_number" in result:
        identifiers.append(result["manuscript_number"])
    if "object_number" in result:
        identifiers.append(result["object_number"])
    identifiers = list(set(identifiers))
    schema.add_property("identifier", identifiers)

    add_schema_field(schema, "materials", "material", result)
    add_schema_field(schema, "rights_statement_id", "license", result)
    add_schema_field(schema, "dimensions", "size", result)
    add_schema_field(schema, "alternate_titles", "alternate_name", result)

    place.add_property("name", result["place_created"])
    schema.add_property("locationCreated", place)
    schema.add_property("thumbnailUrl", result["manifest"]["thumb"])
    schema.add_property("creditText", credit)

    schema.add_property("creator", producers)
    add_schema_field(schema, "date_created", "temporal", result)

edwardanderson · 2023-08-03T13:08:18Z

Just checked our alpha BIBFRAME to Schema.org transformation and we're using:

<> a schema:DefinedTerm ;
  schema:hasPart <> ;
  schema:isPartOf <> ;
  schema:sameAs <> ;
  schema:name "" .

azaroth42 · 2023-08-03T14:34:05Z

And just ignore the "expected" domain and range of hasPart / isPartOf? They expect CreativeWork, but DefinedTerm is an Intangible. That's probably the best we can do, beyond asking for another property to be added to schema.

edwardanderson · 2023-08-09T15:29:41Z

Looks like we should refactor our implementation a little. Also logging here that the Schema.org initiative have twice decided against extending the domain of hasPart and isPartOf:

azaroth42 · 2023-09-06T15:49:30Z

Should be able to round-trip data back to linked art, or understand where there are challenges.

edwardanderson · 2023-09-14T09:42:22Z

A little bit more noodling on the Concept hierarchy problem.

And just ignore the "expected" domain and range of hasPart / isPartOf?

Can we (ab)use composite classes so that broad Concept instances are both schema:DefinedTerm and schema:DefinedTermSet? And then extend the schema:inDefinedTermSet property with a schema:additionalType SKOS qualification?

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300033618>
    a schema:DefinedTerm ;
    schema:name "Painting" ;
    schema:inDefinedTermSet <http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300133025> .

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300133025>
    a schema:DefinedTerm, schema:DefinedTermSet ;
    schema:name "Work of Art" .

schema:inDefinedTermSet
    schema:additionalType "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#narrower"^^schema:URL .

Actually schema:inDefinedTermSet is a subclass of schema:isPartOf... so maybe we don't need the SKOS relation?

azaroth42 · 2023-11-09T21:13:31Z

What about ...

<http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300033618>
    a schema:DefinedTerm, schema:CreativeWork ;
    schema:name "Painting" ;
    schema:inDefinedTermSet <http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/> ;
    schema:isPartOf <http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300123456> .

azaroth42 · 2023-11-09T21:42:48Z

Object Strawperson

Baseline plus...

/type --> VisualArtwork, ArchiveComponent
/classified_as/id --> /artform (painting, sculpture, etc)
/referred_to_by[classified_as/id=DESCRIPTION]/content --> /abstract (other classes use /description)
/referred_to_by[classified_as/id=RIGHTS_STMT]/content --> /copyrightNotice
/referred_to_by[classified_as/id=ACCESS_STMT]/content --> /conditionsOfAccess
/referred_to_by[classified_as/id=CREDIT_STMT]/content --> /creditText
/referred_to_by[classified_as/id=MATERIAL_STMT]/content --> /artMedium
/produced_by/part*/carried_out_by --> /creator or /artist
/produced_by/part*[classified_as=CONTRIBUTOR]/carried_out_by --> /contributor
/produced_by/took_place_at (if a country) --> /countryOfOrigin
/produced_by/timespan --> /dateCreated
/produced_by/took_place_at --> /locationCreated
/partOf --> /isPartOf
/shows|carries --> /exampleOfWork
/made_of --> /material
/content --> /text
/dimension[classified_as/id=HEIGHT]/value --> /height
/dimension[classified_as/id=WIDTH]/value --> /width
/dimension[classified_as/id=DEPTH]/value --> /depth
/current_owner --> /holdingArchive
/current_location --> /itemLocation

Missing:

destruction, partRemoval -- no way to model this in schema that I can find

azaroth42 · 2023-11-10T17:26:13Z

Work Strawperson

Baseline plus ...
/type = CreativeWork (for both Visual and Linguistic)

/about --> /about
/represents[./type=Place] --> /contentLocation
/represents (for all) --> /mainEntity
/language --> /inLanguage (to the Language concept)
/classified_as (where the Concept is a genre) --> /genre
/created_by/part*/carried_out_by --> /author, /artist, or /creator
/used_for[./classified_as/id=PUBLISHING]/carried_out_by --> /publisher
/content --> /text
/dimension --> /size
/format --> /encodingFormat

azaroth42 · 2023-11-28T20:13:12Z

Digital Object Strawperson

/type = CreativeWork, DataSet

/digitally_shows|digitally_carries --> /exampleOfWork
/dimension[classified_as/id=HEIGHT]/value --> /height
/dimension[classified_as/id=WIDTH]/value --> /width
/dimension[classified_as/id=DEPTH]/value --> /depth
/dimension --> /size
/part_of --> /isPartOf
/format --> /encodingFormat
/conforms_to --> ??
/access_point --> /distribution
/created_by/part*/carried_out_by --> /creator
/used_for[./classified_as/id=PUBLISHING]/carried_out_by --> /publisher

azaroth42 · 2023-11-28T21:03:08Z

Collated the mappings as they stand here: https://deploy-preview-540--linked-art.netlify.app/cookbook/mappings/schema.org/

azaroth42 · 2023-12-04T17:19:00Z

Noting from discussion with @krpage and @workergnome (and others) that the Schema.Org representation needs to link to the Linked Art representation (and isn't explicit in the above mapping)

LvanWissen · 2024-06-06T18:38:27Z

Is the mapping ready to be deployed to https://linked.art/cookbook/mappings/schema/ ?

azaroth42 added discuss Discussion of this topic needed best-practice Best practice issue, rather than purely normative labels Jul 10, 2023

azaroth42 added this to the ongoing milestone Nov 15, 2023

azaroth42 mentioned this issue Dec 4, 2023

Machine readable link from HTML page to Linked Art record #541

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Linked Art / Schema.org mapping? #516

Linked Art / Schema.org mapping? #516

azaroth42 commented Jul 10, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 10, 2023

azaroth42 commented Jul 11, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Jul 12, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 12, 2023

azaroth42 commented Jul 12, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

edwardanderson commented Jul 13, 2023

aisaac commented Jul 13, 2023

bulbil commented Jul 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

edwardanderson commented Aug 3, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Aug 3, 2023

edwardanderson commented Aug 9, 2023

azaroth42 commented Sep 6, 2023

edwardanderson commented Sep 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Nov 9, 2023

azaroth42 commented Nov 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Nov 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Nov 28, 2023

azaroth42 commented Nov 28, 2023

azaroth42 commented Dec 4, 2023

LvanWissen commented Jun 6, 2024

Linked Art / Schema.org mapping? #516

Linked Art / Schema.org mapping? #516

Comments

azaroth42 commented Jul 10, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 10, 2023

azaroth42 commented Jul 11, 2023

Baseline

Person

Group

Place

Type / Language / Material / Currency

edwardanderson commented Jul 11, 2023 • edited Loading

azaroth42 commented Jul 12, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 12, 2023

azaroth42 commented Jul 12, 2023

edwardanderson commented Jul 13, 2023 • edited Loading

edwardanderson commented Jul 13, 2023

aisaac commented Jul 13, 2023

bulbil commented Jul 19, 2023 • edited Loading

edwardanderson commented Aug 3, 2023 • edited Loading

azaroth42 commented Aug 3, 2023

edwardanderson commented Aug 9, 2023

azaroth42 commented Sep 6, 2023

edwardanderson commented Sep 14, 2023 • edited Loading

azaroth42 commented Nov 9, 2023

azaroth42 commented Nov 9, 2023 • edited Loading

Object Strawperson

azaroth42 commented Nov 10, 2023 • edited Loading

Work Strawperson

azaroth42 commented Nov 28, 2023

Digital Object Strawperson

azaroth42 commented Nov 28, 2023

azaroth42 commented Dec 4, 2023

LvanWissen commented Jun 6, 2024

edwardanderson commented Jul 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

edwardanderson commented Jul 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

bulbil commented Jul 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

edwardanderson commented Aug 3, 2023 •

edited

Loading

edwardanderson commented Sep 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Nov 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azaroth42 commented Nov 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading