Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow a list of check-names. #35

Open
JoelLefkowitz opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

Allow a list of check-names. #35

JoelLefkowitz opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
1.5.x enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JoelLefkowitz
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently you can specify a single job name with 'check-name' or you can wait for all checks to pass with 'running-workflow-name'. There are situations when you may want to wait for two jobs to complete in parallel before continuing.

@matiasalbarello
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @JoelLefkowitz. I'll take a look.

@progapandist
Copy link

hey @matiasalbarello, thank you for coming back to the project :) I am actually leaving the company in a couple of months and will possibly have no time to keep maintaining this one (I haven't had any already, in months). would you like to take this repo up as a maintainer? For starters, would be great to actually release current master

of course it's fine if you're taken up too, then we can keep looking for maintainers.

@JoelLefkowitz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hey @matiasalbarello, thank you for coming back to the project :) I am actually leaving the company in a couple of months and will possibly have no time to keep maintaining this one (I haven't had any already, in months). would you like to take this repo up as a maintainer? For starters, would be great to actually release current master

of course it's fine if you're taken up too, then we can keep looking for maintainers.

I'm happy to be a maintainer too if you'd like

@progapandist
Copy link

That would be amazing. I will give you push access once I'm back at the computer. Super grateful there's interest to maintain this little project.

@matiasalbarello
Copy link
Contributor

hey @matiasalbarello, thank you for coming back to the project :) I am actually leaving the company in a couple of months and will possibly have no time to keep maintaining this one (I haven't had any already, in months). would you like to take this repo up as a maintainer? For starters, would be great to actually release current master

of course it's fine if you're taken up too, then we can keep looking for maintainers.

Hi @progapandist. Thanks for the consideration. But given the time I could dedicate to this project, I think I'll keep being just a Collaborator. I'll try to be around more frequently though.

@progapandist
Copy link

@JoelLefkowitz, I just invited you as a maintainer, welcome to the project and feel free to discuss everything with @matiasalbarello who contributed a very big deal to this repo and has probably the most expert opinion on the current project structure

@JoelLefkowitz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@JoelLefkowitz, I just invited you as a maintainer, welcome to the project and feel free to discuss everything with @matiasalbarello who contributed a very big deal to this repo and has probably the most expert opinion on the current project structure

Thanks @progapandist , will do.

@tamilselvanmp
Copy link

is it done? can we wait for one or more checks to complete?

@JoelLefkowitz JoelLefkowitz added enhancement New feature or request 1.5.x labels Mar 21, 2025
@JoelLefkowitz JoelLefkowitz self-assigned this Mar 21, 2025
@JoelLefkowitz JoelLefkowitz changed the title Feature request: Allow a list of check-names. Allow a list of check-names. Mar 21, 2025
@JoelLefkowitz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tamilselvanmp, this was not completed in the end. I will add this feature in an upcoming release 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.5.x enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants