Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Audit the SIG ContribEx GitHub team #8047

Open
1 task
palnabarun opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
1 task

Audit the SIG ContribEx GitHub team #8047

palnabarun opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience.

Comments

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

Describe the issue

Historically the GitHub team was used to document the contributors working in a specific community group. As of now, it's not very relevant as GitHub team membership is not tied to group membership.

/sig contributor-experience
/priority important-longterm
/kind cleanup

/assign

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Aug 25, 2024
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

I just noticed this seems a bit stale: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C1TU9EB9S/p1731916285394959

I wonder if there's a better way we can do this for other teams as well ... something to think about.

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member Author

This is a little tough to quantify and prune using a tool as the definition of membership to a SIG isn't very concrete.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

Yeah, but we could do something like asking leads to review this periodically with some low frequency? There has to be a better answer than filing one-off issues.

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member Author

Agreed. This should be something that should be part of an yearly-checklist of each lead.

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member Author

(partly this is how I created the issue)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants