You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What happened?
Created 2 PVCs with the same name (using the same helm chart) in different namespaces while using "reuseAccessPoint". The resulting Volume Handle was the same on both dynamically created PVs. I understand this is for portability, but a namespace separation option is needed as well
What you expected to happen?
2 PVCs should create 2 dynamically created PVs and require 2 different access points for namespace isolation.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
/kind bug
What happened?
Created 2 PVCs with the same name (using the same helm chart) in different namespaces while using "reuseAccessPoint". The resulting Volume Handle was the same on both dynamically created PVs. I understand this is for portability, but a namespace separation option is needed as well
What you expected to happen?
2 PVCs should create 2 dynamically created PVs and require 2 different access points for namespace isolation.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
These should be different. But are not.
Environment
kubectl version
):Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"31", GitVersion:"v1.31.1-eks-ce1d5eb", GitCommit:"13dba3fbdc91154b8ad7d77d07933985753810cc", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2024-09-21T09:30:36Z", GoVersion:"go1.22.6", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Driver version: v2.0.8-eksbuild.1
Instructions to gather debug logs can be found here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: